BALARAM GHOSH vs State Of West Bengal — 207/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 17th March 2026.
Criminal Misc.
CNR: WBBB010005912026
Filing Number
390/2026
Filing Date
20-02-2026
Registration No
207/2026
Registration Date
20-02-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum
Judge
1-District Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
411
Police Station
DUBRAJPUR
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
BALARAM GHOSH
Adv. KAUSTAV GUPTA
UTTAM MONDAL
BENIMADHAB MONDAL
ABHIJIT MONDAL
NILAY MONDAL
PURNA CHANDRA MONDAL
RANJIT BAURI
ARUN KUMAR MONDAL
Respondent(s)
State Of West Bengal
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Judge
Disposed
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
| 20-02-2026 | Hearing of Bail Petition/Petition |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Sessions Judge, Birbhum rejected the anticipatory bail application of eight petitioners under Section 482 of BNSS in a case involving charges under Sections 79, 329(3), 324(4)(5), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, and 3(5) of BNS. The court found sufficient material in the medical report to attract Section 109 BNS and ruled that granting bail would hamper the ongoing investigation, determining that custodial interrogation of the petitioners was necessary given the nature of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Sessions Judge, Birbhum rejected the anticipatory bail application of eight petitioners under Section 482 of BNSS in a case involving charges under Sections 79, 329(3), 324(4)(5), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, and 3(5) of BNS. The court found sufficient material in the medical report to attract Section 109 BNS and ruled that granting bail would hamper the ongoing investigation, determining that custodial interrogation of the petitioners was necessary given the nature of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts