ABDUL HAMID MONDAL vs State Of West Bengal — 191/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBB010005262026

Filing Number

358/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

191/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 14-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABDUL HAMID MONDAL

    Adv. PRASUN BANERJEE

  2. 2.ABDUL SAMAD MONDAL ALIAS ABDUS SAMAD MONDAL

  3. 3.ABDUL AHAD MONDAL

  4. 4.ABUL KASEM MONDAL ALIAS ABUL KASHEM MONDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Sessions Judge, Birbhum rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by four petitioners (Abdul Hamid Mondal and others) under Section 482 BNSS in connection with a criminal case involving serious offences. The court found that the victim sustained very serious injuries, investigation was ongoing, and there was likelihood of evidence tampering if the accused were released, making it inappropriate to grant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 191/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Sessions Judge, Birbhum rejected the anticipatory bail application filed by four petitioners (Abdul Hamid Mondal and others) under Section 482 BNSS in connection with a criminal case involving serious offences. The court found that the victim sustained very serious injuries, investigation was ongoing, and there was likelihood of evidence tampering if the accused were released, making it inappropriate to grant anticipatory bail at that stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case