ALIMADDIN MOLLA ALIAS NANTU vs State Of West Bengal — 188/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED/Granted on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc.

CNR: WBBB010005212026

Filing Number

353/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

188/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, Suri, Birbhum

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED/Granted

Last updated 14-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALIMADDIN MOLLA ALIAS NANTU

    Adv. PRASUN BANERJEE

  2. 2.SAJIRUDDIN MOLLA

  3. 3.RAHUL MOLLA

  4. 4.EMAMUL MOLLA LAIAS ENAMUL MOLLA

  5. 5.AYESUDDIN MOLLA ALIAS DARBES MOLLA

  6. 6.GULSUN NEHAR BIBI ALIAS CHAMPA BIBI

  7. 7.ROJJESHAN BIBI ALIAS LALMUN BIBI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State Of West Bengal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Sessions Judge, Birbhum granted anticipatory bail to seven petitioners in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 329(4), 115(2), 117(2), 110, 74, and 3(5). The court found no material indicating likelihood of absconding or evidence tampering, and noted stagnant investigation progress since February 11, 2026, thereby finding no justification for custodial interrogation. Each petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 3,000 with two sureties of Rs. 1,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 188/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Sessions Judge, Birbhum granted anticipatory bail to seven petitioners in a criminal case involving charges under BNS sections 329(4), 115(2), 117(2), 110, 74, and 3(5). The court found no material indicating likelihood of absconding or evidence tampering, and noted stagnant investigation progress since February 11, 2026, thereby finding no justification for custodial interrogation. Each petitioner was released on bail of Rs. 3,000 with two sureties of Rs. 1,500 each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case