santosh upadhaya and 1 other vs competent authority / SDM — 377/2022
Case under Arbitration Act Section 34. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.
Misc. Civil Cases
CNR: UPST010092182022
Filing Number
818/2022
Filing Date
12-Dec-2022
Registration No
377/2022
Registration Date
16-Dec-2022
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
2-ADJ 1
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.santosh upadhaya and 1 other
Adv. Neeraj Kumar Upadhyaya
-
2.ashish upadhayay
Respondent(s)
-
1.competent authority / SDM
-
2.pariyojana nideshak
-
3.arbitrator / DM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: 377/2022 Court Decision: The court dismissed the petitioners' application challenging an arbitral award dated 29-07-2021 issued by the District Magistrate (arbitrator) in a land acquisition dispute. The court found the application barred by limitation under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and held that the arbitrator did not commit manifest procedural errors warranting setting aside the award. Key Reasoning: The court emphasized that Section 34 applications must be filed within three months of receiving the award, and extensions are restricted. The arbitrator's award regarding compensation for land (Plot No. 230, Alghadpur) acquired for the Lucknow-Varanasi National Highway project was considered valid. The court referenced Supreme Court precedents clarifying that challenges under Section 34 require demonstrating fundamental violations of procedure, Indian law's basic policy, or morality—mere disagreement with factual findings is insufficient grounds for setting aside arbitral awards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
ADJ 1
-
31-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
13-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
28-Feb-2026
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
16-Jan-2026
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
15-Jan-2026
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
10-Dec-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
09-Dec-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
06-Dec-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
25-Nov-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
20-Nov-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
27-Oct-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
16-Oct-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
10-Oct-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
04-Oct-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
29-Sep-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
22-Sep-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
15-Sep-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
06-Sep-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
26-Aug-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
14-Aug-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
04-Aug-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
01-Aug-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
23-Jul-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
16-Jul-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
10-Jul-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
08-Jul-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
27-May-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
16-May-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
07-May-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
30-Apr-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
22-Apr-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
09-Apr-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
02-Apr-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
19-Mar-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
03-Mar-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
14-Feb-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
28-Jan-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
10-Jan-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
04-Jan-2025
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
13-Dec-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
30-Nov-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
15-Nov-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
19-Oct-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
18-Oct-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
04-Sep-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
02-Sep-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
06-Jul-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
28-May-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
03-May-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
12-Apr-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
27-Mar-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
12-Mar-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
27-Feb-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
01-Feb-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
06-Jan-2024
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
14-Dec-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
02-Dec-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
24-Nov-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
02-Nov-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
23-Oct-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
12-Oct-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
04-Oct-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
26-Sep-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
12-Sep-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
05-Sep-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
24-Aug-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
16-Aug-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
04-Aug-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
20-Jul-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
12-Jul-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
07-Jul-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
31-May-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
17-May-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
09-May-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
04-May-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
25-Apr-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
11-Apr-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
04-Apr-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
14-Mar-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
27-Feb-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
16-Feb-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
02-Feb-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
17-Jan-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
04-Jan-2023
Hearing
ADJ 1
-
23-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 377/2022
Case Summary: 377/2022 Court Decision: The court dismissed the petitioners' application challenging an arbitral award dated 29-07-2021 issued by the District Magistrate (arbitrator) in a land acquisition dispute. The court found the application barred by limitation under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and held that the arbitrator did not commit manifest procedural errors warranting setting aside the award. Key Reasoning: The court emphasized that Section 34 applications must be filed within three months of receiving the award, and extensions are restricted. The arbitrator's award regarding compensation for land (Plot No. 230, Alghadpur) acquired for the Lucknow-Varanasi National Highway project was considered valid. The court referenced Supreme Court precedents clarifying that challenges under Section 34 require demonstrating fundamental violations of procedure, Indian law's basic policy, or morality—mere disagreement with factual findings is insufficient grounds for setting aside arbitral awards. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts