gaya prasad dubey and 1 other vs pariyojana nideshak and 1 other — 376/2022

Case under Arbitration Act Section 34. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Civil Cases

CNR: UPST010092162022

Filing Number

816/2022

Filing Date

12-Dec-2022

Registration No

376/2022

Registration Date

16-Dec-2022

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ 1

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Arbitration Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.gaya prasad dubey and 1 other

    Adv. Neeraj Kumar Upadhyaya

  2. 2.rajmani dubey

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.pariyojana nideshak and 1 other

  2. 2.arbitrator / DM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 376/2022 Court Decision: The court set aside the arbitration award dated 29-07-2021 passed by the District Magistrate/Arbitrator in a land acquisition dispute under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The arbitrator mechanically passed the award without applying judicial reasoning, ignored available evidence and proper statutory procedures, and failed to consider the compensation based on land market value as required by compensation law. Key Reasoning: The court found the arbitration process deficient as it did not follow the mandated legal methodology, particularly regarding assessment of acquired land value under the National Highways Act and Stamp Act rules. Recent Supreme Court precedents established that Section 34 petitions are time-barred after three months from award receipt, making timeliness a preliminary jurisdictional question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ 1

  4. 31-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  7. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  9. 28-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  10. 16-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  11. 15-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  12. 10-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  13. 09-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  14. 06-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  15. 25-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  16. 20-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  17. 27-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  18. 16-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  19. 10-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  20. 04-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  21. 29-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  22. 22-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  23. 15-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  24. 06-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  25. 26-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  26. 14-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  27. 04-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  28. 01-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  29. 23-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  30. 16-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  31. 10-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  32. 08-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  33. 27-May-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  34. 16-May-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  35. 07-May-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  36. 30-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  37. 22-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  38. 09-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  39. 02-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  40. 19-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  41. 03-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  42. 14-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  43. 28-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  44. 10-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  45. 04-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  46. 13-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  47. 30-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  48. 15-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  49. 19-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  50. 18-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  51. 04-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  52. 02-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  53. 06-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  54. 28-May-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  55. 03-May-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  56. 12-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  57. 27-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  58. 12-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  59. 27-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  60. 01-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  61. 06-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  62. 14-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  63. 02-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  64. 24-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  65. 02-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  66. 23-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  67. 12-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  68. 04-Oct-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  69. 26-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  70. 12-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  71. 05-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  72. 24-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  73. 16-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  74. 04-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  75. 20-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  76. 12-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  77. 07-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  78. 31-May-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  79. 17-May-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  80. 09-May-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  81. 04-May-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  82. 25-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  83. 11-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  84. 04-Apr-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  85. 14-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  86. 27-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  87. 16-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  88. 02-Feb-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  89. 17-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  90. 04-Jan-2023

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  91. 23-Dec-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  92. 12-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 376/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 376/2022 Court Decision: The court set aside the arbitration award dated 29-07-2021 passed by the District Magistrate/Arbitrator in a land acquisition dispute under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The arbitrator mechanically passed the award without applying judicial reasoning, ignored available evidence and proper statutory procedures, and failed to consider the compensation based on land market value as required by compensation law. Key Reasoning: The court found the arbitration process deficient as it did not follow the mandated legal methodology, particularly regarding assessment of acquired land value under the National Highways Act and Stamp Act rules. Recent Supreme Court precedents established that Section 34 petitions are time-barred after three months from award receipt, making timeliness a preliminary jurisdictional question. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case