Anoop Kumar Mishra vs state — 686/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPST010023072026

Filing Number

2122/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

686/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-ADJ II

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

150

Police Station

Kotwali Lambhua

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3)
Prevention of Atrocities (S.c/s.t Act ) Section 3(1)(R,S)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anoop Kumar Mishra

    Adv. SHIVA KRISHNA PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 686/2026 Court Decision: The Special Judge granted bail to Anoop Kumar Mishra under Case 150/2025, charged under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(d), 3(1)(e). The court found the FIR filed with significant delay (approximately five hours) without satisfactory explanation, the allegations lacked specific details regarding alleged caste-based slurs, the victim's X-ray showed no abnormality, and there was no credible independent witness corroboration, warranting bail approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ II

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 686/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 686/2026 Court Decision: The Special Judge granted bail to Anoop Kumar Mishra under Case 150/2025, charged under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) and SC/ST Act sections 3(1)(d), 3(1)(e). The court found the FIR filed with significant delay (approximately five hours) without satisfactory explanation, the allegations lacked specific details regarding alleged caste-based slurs, the victim's X-ray showed no abnormality, and there was no credible independent witness corroboration, warranting bail approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case