Saurabh Dubey vs state — 692/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506,308. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPST010023062026

Filing Number

2121/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

692/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ 1

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

264

Police Station

Jaisinghpur

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 323,504,506,308

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Saurabh Dubey

    Adv. SANTOSH KUMAR DUBEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Case Summary: 692/2026 - Saurabh Dubey v. State The court rejected Saurabh Dubey's bail application in a case involving charges under IPC sections 308, 323, 504, and 506 arising from an alleged incident on 19-06-2020 where he allegedly assaulted and abused a person. The court held that primary eyewitness evidence exists against the petitioner and that bail cannot be granted merely on procedural grounds; the court must be satisfied that the charge is likely false before granting bail, considering the gravity of offenses, the petitioner's role, and complete facts of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ 1

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 692/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 692/2026 - Saurabh Dubey v. State The court rejected Saurabh Dubey's bail application in a case involving charges under IPC sections 308, 323, 504, and 506 arising from an alleged incident on 19-06-2020 where he allegedly assaulted and abused a person. The court held that primary eyewitness evidence exists against the petitioner and that bail cannot be granted merely on procedural grounds; the court must be satisfied that the charge is likely false before granting bail, considering the gravity of offenses, the petitioner's role, and complete facts of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case