Nisha Yadav vs state — 690/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),319(2),303(2),317(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPST010023052026

Filing Number

2120/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

690/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

9-Adj IV

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

CYBER CRIME SULTANPUR

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 318(4),319(2),303(2),317(2)
Information Technology Act Section 6(C)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nisha Yadav

    Adv. RAVISH CHANDERA PANDEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

    Case Summary: 690/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected Nisha Yadav's anticipatory bail petition. The petitioner was accused of conspiring with co-accused Ajay Singh Yadav to defraud a victim of approximately ₹19 lakh through multiple fraudulent schemes—including fake loans, unauthorized phone access, and fund transfers. The court found credible allegations of serious economic offenses under BNS sections 318(4), 319(2), 303(2), 317(2), and IT Act section 66, determining insufficient grounds to grant pre-arrest bail at the filing stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Adj IV

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Adj IV

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 690/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 690/2026 Court Decision: The court rejected Nisha Yadav's anticipatory bail petition. The petitioner was accused of conspiring with co-accused Ajay Singh Yadav to defraud a victim of approximately ₹19 lakh through multiple fraudulent schemes—including fake loans, unauthorized phone access, and fund transfers. The court found credible allegations of serious economic offenses under BNS sections 318(4), 319(2), 303(2), 317(2), and IT Act section 66, determining insufficient grounds to grant pre-arrest bail at the filing stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case