Amir Firdaush vs state — 687/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(A)(i),89,115(2),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPST010022962026

Filing Number

2112/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

687/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

38-ADJ Fast Track Court -I

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

55

Police Station

Baldi Rai

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 64(2)(A)(i),89,115(2),352,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amir Firdaush

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

    Case Summary: Bail Application 687/2026 Court Decision: The bail application of Amir Firdaush is REJECTED. Key Facts & Reasoning: Amir Firdaush, a police constable, is accused under IPC Sections 64(2)(a)(i), 89, 115(2), 352, and 351(3) of luring a married woman with false promises of marriage, engaging in sexual relations without consent, causing her pregnancy, and threatening her life. The complainant provided detailed statements and medical evidence (positive UPT report) corroborating the charges. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused and determined that bail was not warranted given the serious nature of the offenses, the accused's position as a police officer (creating flight risk and witness tampering concerns), and the vulnerability and threats faced by the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ Fast Track Court -I

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 687/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Bail Application 687/2026 Court Decision: The bail application of Amir Firdaush is REJECTED. Key Facts & Reasoning: Amir Firdaush, a police constable, is accused under IPC Sections 64(2)(a)(i), 89, 115(2), 352, and 351(3) of luring a married woman with false promises of marriage, engaging in sexual relations without consent, causing her pregnancy, and threatening her life. The complainant provided detailed statements and medical evidence (positive UPT report) corroborating the charges. The court found prima facie evidence against the accused and determined that bail was not warranted given the serious nature of the offenses, the accused's position as a police officer (creating flight risk and witness tampering concerns), and the vulnerability and threats faced by the victim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case