Sahabjade vs state — 637/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3),109,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPST010020022026
Filing Number
1826/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
637/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-ADJ II
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
112
Police Station
Kotwali Nagar
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sahabjade
Adv. KASHI PRASAD SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
-
1.state
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudgementView PDF
Case Summary: 637/2026 The court granted bail to petitioner Sahabjade in a case involving charges under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109, 3(5) and SC/ST Act section 3(2)5. The incident allegedly involved an attack on the petitioner's brother Ravi on February 17, 2026, with caste-based slurs used. The court found the injuries were simple in nature without clear weapon evidence, no prior criminal history of the accused, and credibility issues with prosecution evidence (missing X-ray reports and medical inconsistencies). Bail was granted on personal recognizance of Rs. 75,000 with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
ADJ II
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
ADJ II
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 637/2026
Case Summary: 637/2026 The court granted bail to petitioner Sahabjade in a case involving charges under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109, 3(5) and SC/ST Act section 3(2)5. The incident allegedly involved an attack on the petitioner's brother Ravi on February 17, 2026, with caste-based slurs used. The court found the injuries were simple in nature without clear weapon evidence, no prior criminal history of the accused, and credibility issues with prosecution evidence (missing X-ray reports and medical inconsistencies). Bail was granted on personal recognizance of Rs. 75,000 with standard conditions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts