PRINSHU MISHRA vs state — 636/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPST010019872026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1813/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

636/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

40

Police Station

Bandhuakalan

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),352,351(3)
Explosive Substances Act Section 3,4,5

Petitioner(s)

PRINSHU MISHRA

Respondent(s)

state

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District & Session Judge

12-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Judgement

Case 636/2026 Summary Decision: The court granted Prinshu Mishra's bail petition under IPC Sections 109(1), 351(3), and 352, and Explosive Substances Act Sections 3/4/5. The court found significant discrepancies in the FIR: the incident occurred at 1:44 PM on 2/24/2026 but was registered 8+ hours later; Mishra was not named in the original FIR but appeared only during investigation; and no injuries were reported from the alleged bomb blast. The court determined the accused had no prior criminal history and substantial grounds existed for bail on a bond of Rs. 40,000 with conditions including cooperation in proceedings, non-involvement in similar offenses, and no departure from India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 636/2026 Summary Decision: The court granted Prinshu Mishra's bail petition under IPC Sections 109(1), 351(3), and 352, and Explosive Substances Act Sections 3/4/5. The court found significant discrepancies in the FIR: the incident occurred at 1:44 PM on 2/24/2026 but was registered 8+ hours later; Mishra was not named in the original FIR but appeared only during investigation; and no injuries were reported from the alleged bomb blast. The court determined the accused had no prior criminal history and substantial grounds existed for bail on a bond of Rs. 40,000 with conditions including cooperation in proceedings, non-involvement in similar offenses, and no departure from India without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case