Galib Hussain vs state — 623/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 127(2),308(5),351(3),352,3(5),61(2),316(3),115(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPST010019302026

Filing Number

1760/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

623/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

39-A.D.J. Fast Track Court -II

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 23-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 127(2),308(5),351(3),352,3(5),61(2),316(3),115(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Galib Hussain

    Adv. KASHI PRASAD SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Bail Bond/Personal BondView PDF

    Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sultanpur granted bail to the accused Ghalib Hussain in a case involving charges of criminal conspiracy, wrongful confinement, extortion, and criminal intimidation under the BNS. The court found that while the alleged crime was serious (involving kidnapping, extortion of approximately ₹4.37 lakh, and threats), the accused's name did not appear in the original FIR and emerged only during investigation, with no prior criminal history presented by the prosecution. Accordingly, bail was granted on personal bond of ₹50,000 with local surety and conditions including court cooperation, non-interference with witnesses, and regular attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    A.D.J. Fast Track Court -II

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    A.D.J. Fast Track Court -II

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 623/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sultanpur granted bail to the accused Ghalib Hussain in a case involving charges of criminal conspiracy, wrongful confinement, extortion, and criminal intimidation under the BNS. The court found that while the alleged crime was serious (involving kidnapping, extortion of approximately ₹4.37 lakh, and threats), the accused's name did not appear in the original FIR and emerged only during investigation, with no prior criminal history presented by the prosecution. Accordingly, bail was granted on personal bond of ₹50,000 with local surety and conditions including court cooperation, non-interference with witnesses, and regular attendance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case