Meera Devi vs state — 584/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),191(2),352,351(3),110,117(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPST010018222026

Filing Number

1662/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

584/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

2-ADJ 1

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 23-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),191(2),352,351(3),110,117(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Meera Devi

  2. 2.Jayra urf jayka

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of document.View PDF

    Summary The court granted bail to the two accused (Mira Devi and Jayara) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 115(2), 191(2), 352, 351(3), 110, and 117(2) relating to a violent attack on the complainant's family on April 19, 2025. The court found that while injuries were sustained, the medical evidence showed no grievous or fracture injuries, and considering the accused's clean criminal record and other case circumstances, bail was deemed appropriate with conditions including a bond of ₹50,000 each and a surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ 1

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ 1

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 584/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted bail to the two accused (Mira Devi and Jayara) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 115(2), 191(2), 352, 351(3), 110, and 117(2) relating to a violent attack on the complainant's family on April 19, 2025. The court found that while injuries were sustained, the medical evidence showed no grievous or fracture injuries, and considering the accused's clean criminal record and other case circumstances, bail was deemed appropriate with conditions including a bond of ₹50,000 each and a surety of equal amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case