ARBAAZ URF AYAAZ vs state — 578/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3),109,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPST010018042026
Filing Number
1649/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
578/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-ADJ II
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
112
Police Station
Kotwali Nagar
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ARBAAZ URF AYAAZ
Adv. KASHI PRASAD SHUKLA
Respondent(s)
state
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADJ II
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 578/2026 Petitioner: Arbaaz urf Ayaaz Ahmad Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh Court Decision: The Special Judge granted bail to the petitioner under Section 437 CrPC. The court accepted the bail application on the following conditions: the petitioner must furnish a personal bond of ₹75,000 with one surety of equal amount, appear before the court as directed, not commit any offense related to the charges, not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence, and cooperate fully with the proceedings. Key Reasoning: The court found that while serious charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109, and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)5 were registered following a violent incident on February 17, 2026, the medical evidence was incomplete and contradictory. Critical X-ray reports and medical examination records were not produced despite being promised. The petitioner had no prior criminal history and had been in judicial custody for one month. The court determined that granting bail would be appropriate under the circumstances without commenting on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 578/2026 Petitioner: Arbaaz urf Ayaaz Ahmad Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh Court Decision: The Special Judge granted bail to the petitioner under Section 437 CrPC. The court accepted the bail application on the following conditions: the petitioner must furnish a personal bond of ₹75,000 with one surety of equal amount, appear before the court as directed, not commit any offense related to the charges, not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence, and cooperate fully with the proceedings. Key Reasoning: The court found that while serious charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109, and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)5 were registered following a violent incident on February 17, 2026, the medical evidence was incomplete and contradictory. Critical X-ray reports and medical examination records were not produced despite being promised. The petitioner had no prior criminal history and had been in judicial custody for one month. The court determined that granting bail would be appropriate under the circumstances without commenting on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts