ARBAAZ URF AYAAZ vs state — 578/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3),109,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPST010018042026

Filing Number

1649/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

578/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-ADJ II

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

112

Police Station

Kotwali Nagar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3),109,3(5)
Prevention of Atrocities (S.c/s.t Act ) Section 3(2)(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARBAAZ URF AYAAZ

    Adv. KASHI PRASAD SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case Summary: 578/2026 Petitioner: Arbaaz urf Ayaaz Ahmad Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh Court Decision: The Special Judge granted bail to the petitioner under Section 437 CrPC. The court accepted the bail application on the following conditions: the petitioner must furnish a personal bond of ₹75,000 with one surety of equal amount, appear before the court as directed, not commit any offense related to the charges, not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence, and cooperate fully with the proceedings. Key Reasoning: The court found that while serious charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109, and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)5 were registered following a violent incident on February 17, 2026, the medical evidence was incomplete and contradictory. Critical X-ray reports and medical examination records were not produced despite being promised. The petitioner had no prior criminal history and had been in judicial custody for one month. The court determined that granting bail would be appropriate under the circumstances without commenting on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    ADJ II

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ II

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ II

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    ADJ II

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 578/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 578/2026 Petitioner: Arbaaz urf Ayaaz Ahmad Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh Court Decision: The Special Judge granted bail to the petitioner under Section 437 CrPC. The court accepted the bail application on the following conditions: the petitioner must furnish a personal bond of ₹75,000 with one surety of equal amount, appear before the court as directed, not commit any offense related to the charges, not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence, and cooperate fully with the proceedings. Key Reasoning: The court found that while serious charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109, and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)5 were registered following a violent incident on February 17, 2026, the medical evidence was incomplete and contradictory. Critical X-ray reports and medical examination records were not produced despite being promised. The petitioner had no prior criminal history and had been in judicial custody for one month. The court determined that granting bail would be appropriate under the circumstances without commenting on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case