ARBAAZ URF AYAAZ vs state — 578/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3),109,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPST010018042026

Case disposed

Filing Number

1649/2026

Filing Date

26-02-2026

Registration No

578/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-ADJ II

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

112

Police Station

Kotwali Nagar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 115(2),352,351(3),109,3(5)
Prevention of Atrocities (S.C/S.T Act ) Section 3(2)(5)

Petitioner(s)

ARBAAZ URF AYAAZ

Adv. KASHI PRASAD SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

state

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADJ II

16-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Hearing

10-03-2026

Hearing

07-03-2026

Hearing

26-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Judgement

Case Summary: 578/2026 Petitioner: Arbaaz urf Ayaaz Ahmad Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh Court Decision: The Special Judge granted bail to the petitioner under Section 437 CrPC. The court accepted the bail application on the following conditions: the petitioner must furnish a personal bond of ₹75,000 with one surety of equal amount, appear before the court as directed, not commit any offense related to the charges, not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence, and cooperate fully with the proceedings. Key Reasoning: The court found that while serious charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109, and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)5 were registered following a violent incident on February 17, 2026, the medical evidence was incomplete and contradictory. Critical X-ray reports and medical examination records were not produced despite being promised. The petitioner had no prior criminal history and had been in judicial custody for one month. The court determined that granting bail would be appropriate under the circumstances without commenting on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 578/2026 Petitioner: Arbaaz urf Ayaaz Ahmad Respondent: State of Uttar Pradesh Court Decision: The Special Judge granted bail to the petitioner under Section 437 CrPC. The court accepted the bail application on the following conditions: the petitioner must furnish a personal bond of ₹75,000 with one surety of equal amount, appear before the court as directed, not commit any offense related to the charges, not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence, and cooperate fully with the proceedings. Key Reasoning: The court found that while serious charges under IPC Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109, and SC/ST Act Section 3(2)5 were registered following a violent incident on February 17, 2026, the medical evidence was incomplete and contradictory. Critical X-ray reports and medical examination records were not produced despite being promised. The petitioner had no prior criminal history and had been in judicial custody for one month. The court determined that granting bail would be appropriate under the circumstances without commenting on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case