Ghanshyam Pandey vs state — 548/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 140(2),115(2),351(3),317(2),127(2),318(4),336(3),340(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPST010017362026

Filing Number

1594/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

548/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District & Session Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

22

Police Station

Kotwali Musafirkhana

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 140(2),115(2),351(3),317(2),127(2),318(4),336(3),340(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ghanshyam Pandey

    Adv. SATYENDRA KUMAR SHUKLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudgementView PDF

    Case 548/2026 - Ghanshyam Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh Court Decision (Bail Application - REJECTED): The court rejected the bail petition of Ghanshyam Pandey, who is accused in a kidnapping and extortion case (FIR 22/2026 under IPC Sections 140(2), 115(2), 317(2), 127(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 351(3)). The complainant alleged that on February 10, 2026, four unknown persons in a white car kidnapped him, beat him, threatened him with death, and extorted ₹9,28,000 across multiple bank transfers and cash withdrawals. The court found serious charges including organized criminal activity for ransom, physical assault, and death threats, determining that bail was not warranted given the gravity of the allegations and evidence of the accused's involvement in the organized extortion racket. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District & Session Judge

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District & Session Judge

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 548/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 548/2026 - Ghanshyam Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh Court Decision (Bail Application - REJECTED): The court rejected the bail petition of Ghanshyam Pandey, who is accused in a kidnapping and extortion case (FIR 22/2026 under IPC Sections 140(2), 115(2), 317(2), 127(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 351(3)). The complainant alleged that on February 10, 2026, four unknown persons in a white car kidnapped him, beat him, threatened him with death, and extorted ₹9,28,000 across multiple bank transfers and cash withdrawals. The court found serious charges including organized criminal activity for ransom, physical assault, and death threats, determining that bail was not warranted given the gravity of the allegations and evidence of the accused's involvement in the organized extortion racket. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case