AABID HUSAIN vs SAJJAD KHAN — 1318/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Uncontested--REJECT on 23rd March 2026.

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPSR040122182025

Case disposed

Filing Number

12209/2025

Filing Date

18-12-2025

Registration No

1318/2025

Registration Date

18-12-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECT

FIR Details

Police Station

Ikauna

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4)

Petitioner(s)

AABID HUSAIN

Adv. Himanshu Mishra

Respondent(s)

SAJJAD KHAN

DADU

MAHTAB

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

23-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

Hearing

11-03-2026

Hearing

06-03-2026

Hearing

05-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Copy of Order

Summary The court rejected the petitioner Aabid Hussain's petition under Section 173(4) BNSS seeking to direct police to register a case against Sajjad Khan regarding a matrimonial dispute. The court found that the dispute concerned a scheduled marriage where both parties had already settled the matter through compromise, and the petitioner provided no concrete evidence or proper grounds to justify using court proceedings to pressurize the respondent into marriage. The court upheld established precedent that judicial processes cannot be weaponized to coerce individuals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the petitioner Aabid Hussain's petition under Section 173(4) BNSS seeking to direct police to register a case against Sajjad Khan regarding a matrimonial dispute. The court found that the dispute concerned a scheduled marriage where both parties had already settled the matter through compromise, and the petitioner provided no concrete evidence or proper grounds to justify using court proceedings to pressurize the respondent into marriage. The court upheld established precedent that judicial processes cannot be weaponized to coerce individuals. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case