BRIJENDRA GOSWAMI vs JAGDAMBA PRASAD — 75/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Uncontested--REJECT on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPSR040006202026

Filing Number

620/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

75/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECT

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Ikauna

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BRIJENDRA GOSWAMI

    Adv. Jagdish Prasad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAGDAMBA PRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court at Shravasti dismissed the petition filed by Brijendra Goswami under Section 173(4) BNSS. The court found that despite being given multiple opportunities for hearing, the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear in court and did not file any adjournment request, indicating lack of genuine interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 13-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 75/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate Court at Shravasti dismissed the petition filed by Brijendra Goswami under Section 173(4) BNSS. The court found that despite being given multiple opportunities for hearing, the petitioner repeatedly failed to appear in court and did not file any adjournment request, indicating lack of genuine interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case