State vs Nanbabu — 300955/2012
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 342,323,506. Disposed: Uncontested--ACQUITTED on 24th March 2026.
Cri. Case
CNR: UPSR040005802012
Filing Number
300955/2012
Filing Date
03-May-2012
Registration No
300955/2012
Registration Date
03-May-2012
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate
Judge
3-Chief Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
14
Police Station
Ikauna
Year
2012
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Adv. S.P.O Shravasti
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nanbabu
-
2.Subhash
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Shravasti acquitted accused Nanababu and Subhash under IPC Sections 323, 342, and 506. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt—the two key prosecution witnesses (PW-1 and PW-2) denied the alleged incident of forcible abduction and beating, and the prosecution presented no independent eyewitnesses to corroborate the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Mar-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Mar-2026
Judgement
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Arguments
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Feb-2026
Rest Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2026
Rest Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jan-2026
Rest Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Jan-2026
Rest Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2025
Rest Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Nov-2025
Rest Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Sep-2025
Rest Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Apr-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ftc/Acjm
-
30-Jan-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ftc/Acjm
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ftc/Acjm
-
28-Oct-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ftc/Acjm
-
10-Sep-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ftc/Acjm
-
02-Aug-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ftc/Acjm
-
30-May-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ftc/Acjm
-
12-Apr-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ftc/Acjm
-
11-Mar-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ftc/Acjm
-
08-Jan-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge (Senior Division) Ftc/Acjm
-
28-Nov-2023
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Oct-2023
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Sep-2023
Restored
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Sep-2023
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Jan-2020
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Dec-2019
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Aug-2019
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Aug-2019
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-May-2019
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2019
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
03-Dec-2018
Evidence
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Sep-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jun-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Mar-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jan-2018
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Oct-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Aug-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Apr-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Jan-2017
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Oct-2016
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jul-2016
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Apr-2016
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Oct-2015
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Jun-2015
Appearance
Chief Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2013
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-May-2012
Case filed
Registration No. 300955/2012
Court Decision Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate of Shravasti acquitted accused Nanababu and Subhash under IPC Sections 323, 342, and 506. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt—the two key prosecution witnesses (PW-1 and PW-2) denied the alleged incident of forcible abduction and beating, and the prosecution presented no independent eyewitnesses to corroborate the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts