GAYTRI SHRIVASTAVA vs VIDYADHAR SHRIVASTAVA — 68/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Uncontested--REJECT on 19th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Misc. Cases

CNR: UPSR040005672026

Filing Number

567/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

68/2026

Registration Date

29-Jan-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

19-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECT

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

Ikauna

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAYTRI SHRIVASTAVA

    Adv. Vineet Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIDYADHAR SHRIVASTAVA

  2. 2.JAGDAMBA PRASAD

  3. 3.GIRVAR PRASAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shravasti dismissed the petitioner's (Gayatri Srivastav) petition under Section 173(4) BNSS seeking investigation into alleged land fraud. The court found the dispute primarily concerns civil property registration matters, not criminal offenses, and held that when civil remedies are available, criminal proceedings should not be pursued, citing Supreme Court precedents against misuse of criminal law for civil disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 05-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 05-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 68/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shravasti dismissed the petitioner's (Gayatri Srivastav) petition under Section 173(4) BNSS seeking investigation into alleged land fraud. The court found the dispute primarily concerns civil property registration matters, not criminal offenses, and held that when civil remedies are available, criminal proceedings should not be pursued, citing Supreme Court precedents against misuse of criminal law for civil disputes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case