State vs balak ramors — 302732/2009

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 325,323,504,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri. Case

CNR: UPSR040005312009

Filing Number

302732/2009

Filing Date

08-Jul-2009

Registration No

302732/2009

Registration Date

08-Jul-2009

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate

Judge

3-Chief Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

02

Police Station

Bhinga

Year

2009

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 325,323,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.balak ramors

  2. 2.Swaminath

  3. 3.Pradeep kumar

  4. 4.Neebar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgementView PDF

    The court acquitted defendants Balakram, Nibar, Swaminath, and Pradeep Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 323, 325, 504, and 506 (assault, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation) due to reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the key witnesses (the complainant and his wife) contradicted the allegation during cross-examination, claiming the injuries resulted from falling on the road rather than being beaten by the accused, and no independent witness corroborated the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  5. 03-Nov-2025

    Rest Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  6. 21-Aug-2025

    Rest Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  7. 02-Aug-2025

    Rest Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  8. 30-Jul-2025

    Cross Examination Pw

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  9. 24-Jul-2025

    Cross Examination Pw

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  10. 08-Jul-2025

    Cross Examination Pw

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  11. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  12. 05-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  13. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  14. 21-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 25-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  16. 14-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  17. 24-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  18. 29-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  19. 29-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  20. 16-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  21. 25-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  22. 03-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  23. 29-May-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  24. 27-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  25. 02-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 15-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  27. 30-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  28. 28-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  29. 24-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  30. 24-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  31. 18-Aug-2021

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  32. 29-May-2021

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  33. 05-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  34. 08-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  35. 03-Sep-2020

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  36. 03-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  37. 18-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  38. 05-Nov-2019

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  39. 19-Jul-2019

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  40. 11-Jun-2019

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  41. 16-Mar-2019

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  42. 01-Jan-2019

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  43. 17-Oct-2018

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  44. 25-Jul-2018

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  45. 25-Apr-2018

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  46. 15-Feb-2018

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  47. 27-Nov-2017

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  48. 12-Sep-2017

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  49. 07-Jul-2017

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  50. 24-May-2017

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  51. 24-Jan-2017

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  52. 24-Oct-2016

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  53. 20-Jul-2016

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  54. 24-Jun-2016

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  55. 01-Apr-2016

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  56. 06-Feb-2016

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  57. 05-Oct-2015

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  58. 15-Jun-2015

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  59. 27-Feb-2015

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  60. 10-Oct-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 08-Jul-2009

    Case filed

    Registration No. 302732/2009

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted defendants Balakram, Nibar, Swaminath, and Pradeep Kumar of charges under IPC Sections 323, 325, 504, and 506 (assault, voluntarily causing hurt, and criminal intimidation) due to reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt, as the key witnesses (the complainant and his wife) contradicted the allegation during cross-examination, claiming the injuries resulted from falling on the road rather than being beaten by the accused, and no independent witness corroborated the prosecution's narrative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case