Mohammed sharif vs Abdul hakim — 17/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 43rule1. Disposed: Contested--APPEAL ACCEPTED on 12th March 2026.

Misc. Civil Appeal

CNR: UPSR010021202023

Case disposed

Filing Number

100/2023

Filing Date

24-11-2023

Registration No

17/2023

Registration Date

24-11-2023

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

4-Additional District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--APPEAL ACCEPTED

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 43rule1

Petitioner(s)

Mohammed sharif

Adv. Abhishek Tripathi

Akbar ali

saddam

Ilahuhak

Anwarulhak

Respondent(s)

Abdul hakim

Mohammed Arif

Mohd. Yunus

Iliyas

Mulim

Nanake

Hearing History

Judge: 4-Additional District and Sessions Judge

12-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Judgement

27-02-2026

Hearing

20-02-2026

Hearing

09-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
Copy of Judgement

Summary The court partially allowed the appeal against the lower court's order dated 19.10.2023. The lower court had issued an interim order restricting the appellants' possession to only a portion (marked as k,kh,s in red) of disputed property (Plot 590), while both parties are joint owners. The appellate court found this was unjustified and ordered that both parties maintain possession of the entire plot (marked as a,b,s) until a formal partition/division occurs, with neither party making new constructions without court approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially allowed the appeal against the lower court's order dated 19.10.2023. The lower court had issued an interim order restricting the appellants' possession to only a portion (marked as k,kh,s in red) of disputed property (Plot 590), while both parties are joint owners. The appellate court found this was unjustified and ordered that both parties maintain possession of the entire plot (marked as a,b,s) until a formal partition/division occurs, with neither party making new constructions without court approval. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case