State vs Amiruddin — 418/2025
Case under The Uttar Pradesh Electricity Act,2003 Section 135-1(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED AND FINED on 14th March 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPSR010017802025
e-Filing Number
15-10-2025
Filing Number
1685/2025
Filing Date
15-Oct-2025
Registration No
418/2025
Registration Date
15-Oct-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED AND FINED
Last updated 28-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
324
Police Station
ANTI POWER THEFT THANA SHRAVASTI
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State
Respondent(s)
-
1.Amiruddin
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Amiruddin (418/2025) The Additional Sessions Court, Shravasti, accepted Amiruddin's plea of guilty admission in an electricity theft case (Crime No. 324/2022 under Section 135-1-A of the Electricity Act). The court convicted and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 5,000, with 10 days simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. The electricity department retains the right to recover any outstanding revenue dues separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Summon
Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Summon
Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Summon
Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
15-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 418/2025
Case Summary: State v. Amiruddin (418/2025) The Additional Sessions Court, Shravasti, accepted Amiruddin's plea of guilty admission in an electricity theft case (Crime No. 324/2022 under Section 135-1-A of the Electricity Act). The court convicted and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 5,000, with 10 days simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid. The electricity department retains the right to recover any outstanding revenue dues separately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts