Usha Devi vs Narendra Advocate - Kaushlendra Kumar Yadav — 61/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,376D,. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
Warrant or Summons Criminal Case
CNR: UPSR010014452024
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1245/2024
Filing Date
28-08-2024
Registration No
61/2024
Registration Date
28-08-2024
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)
FIR Details
FIR Number
18
Police Station
NAVIN MODERN POLICE THANA
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Usha Devi
Adv. Jai Prakash Narayan Tiwari
Respondent(s)
Narendra Advocate - Kaushlendra Kumar Yadav
Sanjay Sharma
balister singh yadav
Khayaliram
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 28-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 27-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The court has rejected the final report of acquittal and issued summons to the accused (Narendra Singh Yadav, Sanjay Sharma, Balister Singh Yadav, and Khyaliram) to stand trial for serious charges including rape, criminal intimidation, and exploitation of a minor under the POCSO Act. The court found credible evidence of the victim's consistent testimony, victim's statement under Section 164 CrPC, and corroborating witness accounts that suggest the accused committed sexual offences and abduction of a 14-year-old girl on March 6-7, 2024. The investigation was found to be biased and inadequate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court has rejected the final report of acquittal and issued summons to the accused (Narendra Singh Yadav, Sanjay Sharma, Balister Singh Yadav, and Khyaliram) to stand trial for serious charges including rape, criminal intimidation, and exploitation of a minor under the POCSO Act. The court found credible evidence of the victim's consistent testimony, victim's statement under Section 164 CrPC, and corroborating witness accounts that suggest the accused committed sexual offences and abduction of a 14-year-old girl on March 6-7, 2024. The investigation was found to be biased and inadequate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts