State vs Ganga ram — 122/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 306. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Sessions Case

CNR: UPSR010005592023

Filing Number

495/2023

Filing Date

27-Mar-2023

Registration No

122/2023

Registration Date

27-Mar-2023

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

80

Police Station

Bhinga

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 306

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ganga ram

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgementView PDF

    Summary: State v. Ganga Ram (Session Case 122/2023) The court acquitted accused Ganga Ram of charges under IPC Section 306 (abetment of suicide). The prosecution failed to establish that the accused instigated the victim (Bhabhuti Prasad) to commit suicide. While the medical evidence confirmed the victim died by hanging due to asphyxiation, the prosecution witnesses provided contradictory and unreliable testimony, with key witnesses denying knowledge of any provocation or instigation by the accused. The court found insufficient credible evidence linking the accused's alleged dispute over money to the victim's suicide, making the prosecution case unproven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 29-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    District and Sessions Judge

  7. 20-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  8. 17-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  9. 03-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  11. 08-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  12. 17-Nov-2025

    Defence Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  13. 10-Nov-2025

    Statement U/S 313

    District and Sessions Judge

  14. 30-Oct-2025

    Statement U/S 313

    District and Sessions Judge

  15. 07-Oct-2025

    Statement U/S 313

    District and Sessions Judge

  16. 09-Sep-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  17. 21-Aug-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  18. 02-Aug-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  19. 15-Jul-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  20. 26-Jun-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  21. 23-May-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  22. 02-May-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  23. 22-Apr-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  24. 09-Apr-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  25. 27-Mar-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  26. 19-Mar-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  27. 05-Mar-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  28. 21-Feb-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  29. 07-Feb-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  30. 30-Jan-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  31. 21-Jan-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  32. 01-Jan-2025

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  33. 19-Dec-2024

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  34. 02-Dec-2024

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  35. 16-Nov-2024

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  36. 19-Oct-2024

    Rest Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  37. 23-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  38. 21-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  39. 19-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  40. 03-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  41. 09-May-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  42. 08-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  43. 06-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  44. 05-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  45. 03-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  46. 15-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  47. 29-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  48. 01-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  49. 17-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  50. 15-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  51. 11-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  52. 17-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  53. 19-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  54. 29-May-2023

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  55. 05-May-2023

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  56. 04-May-2023

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  57. 11-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    District and Sessions Judge

  58. 31-Mar-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 27-Mar-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 122/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: State v. Ganga Ram (Session Case 122/2023) The court acquitted accused Ganga Ram of charges under IPC Section 306 (abetment of suicide). The prosecution failed to establish that the accused instigated the victim (Bhabhuti Prasad) to commit suicide. While the medical evidence confirmed the victim died by hanging due to asphyxiation, the prosecution witnesses provided contradictory and unreliable testimony, with key witnesses denying knowledge of any provocation or instigation by the accused. The court found insufficient credible evidence linking the accused's alleged dispute over money to the victim's suicide, making the prosecution case unproven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case