State vs rahul others — 108/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 376,. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 03rd April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPSR010005182024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
447/2024
Filing Date
30-03-2024
Registration No
108/2024
Registration Date
30-03-2024
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)
Decision Date
03rd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Respondent(s)
rahul others
pintu singh @ suresh
suresh @ tikaram @ badakau
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 03-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence | |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted accused Rahul and three co-accused (Pintu Singh, Suresh, and Suresh Tikaaram) of charges under IPC Section 376 (rape), POCSO Act Sections 3/4, and ITP Act Section 67. The court found that prosecution evidence was contradictory and insufficiently proved the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, particularly noting the victim's inconsistent statements and lack of credible corroborating evidence, thus granting them benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted accused Rahul and three co-accused (Pintu Singh, Suresh, and Suresh Tikaaram) of charges under IPC Section 376 (rape), POCSO Act Sections 3/4, and ITP Act Section 67. The court found that prosecution evidence was contradictory and insufficiently proved the allegations beyond reasonable doubt, particularly noting the victim's inconsistent statements and lack of credible corroborating evidence, thus granting them benefit of doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts