Omprakash urph patwari vs State — 182/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),115(2),352,351(3),87. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPSR010004862026

Case disposed

Filing Number

460/2026

Filing Date

12-03-2026

Registration No

182/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

85

Police Station

Bhinga

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),115(2),352,351(3),87

Petitioner(s)

Omprakash urph patwari

Adv. Dinesh Kumar Yadav

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

18-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary: 182/2026 Court Decision: The Session Judge of Shravasti granted bail to Omprakash (age 23) with conditions, finding insufficient evidence of serious misconduct. The court noted the complainant's statement under Section 183 CrPC explicitly denied the allegations of abduction and assault. Key Reasoning: The court observed that the FIR was registered two days after the alleged incident without clear evidence, the petitioner had no prior criminal history, and the medical examination confirmed the complainant's age as 18 years. The petitioner was ordered to appear regularly before court and furnish two sureties of ₹50,000 each with an undertaking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 182/2026 Court Decision: The Session Judge of Shravasti granted bail to Omprakash (age 23) with conditions, finding insufficient evidence of serious misconduct. The court noted the complainant's statement under Section 183 CrPC explicitly denied the allegations of abduction and assault. Key Reasoning: The court observed that the FIR was registered two days after the alleged incident without clear evidence, the petitioner had no prior criminal history, and the medical examination confirmed the complainant's age as 18 years. The petitioner was ordered to appear regularly before court and furnish two sureties of ₹50,000 each with an undertaking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case