Omprakash urph patwari vs State — 182/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),115(2),352,351(3),87. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 18th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSR010004862026
Filing Number
460/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
182/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
85
Police Station
Bhinga
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Omprakash urph patwari
Adv. Dinesh Kumar Yadav
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 182/2026 Court Decision: The Session Judge of Shravasti granted bail to Omprakash (age 23) with conditions, finding insufficient evidence of serious misconduct. The court noted the complainant's statement under Section 183 CrPC explicitly denied the allegations of abduction and assault. Key Reasoning: The court observed that the FIR was registered two days after the alleged incident without clear evidence, the petitioner had no prior criminal history, and the medical examination confirmed the complainant's age as 18 years. The petitioner was ordered to appear regularly before court and furnish two sureties of ₹50,000 each with an undertaking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 182/2026 Court Decision: The Session Judge of Shravasti granted bail to Omprakash (age 23) with conditions, finding insufficient evidence of serious misconduct. The court noted the complainant's statement under Section 183 CrPC explicitly denied the allegations of abduction and assault. Key Reasoning: The court observed that the FIR was registered two days after the alleged incident without clear evidence, the petitioner had no prior criminal history, and the medical examination confirmed the complainant's age as 18 years. The petitioner was ordered to appear regularly before court and furnish two sureties of ₹50,000 each with an undertaking. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts