Anandi Lal vs State — 178/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSR010004812026

Filing Number

455/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

178/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

303

Police Station

Ikauna

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,351(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Anandi Lal

    Adv. Ram Gopal Shukla

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Anandi Lal v. State (178/2026) The court granted bail to Anandi Lal, accused of criminal intimidation and criminal intimidation causing fear of death under IPC Sections 351(3) and 352. The accused was charged with threatening and assaulting a minor boy on November 4, 2025, allegedly instructing him not to disclose the incident and physically abusing him. The court found the offense to be bailable, noted the accused had no prior criminal history, and determined he voluntarily surrendered. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on condition of regular court appearance and compliance with trial procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 178/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Anandi Lal v. State (178/2026) The court granted bail to Anandi Lal, accused of criminal intimidation and criminal intimidation causing fear of death under IPC Sections 351(3) and 352. The accused was charged with threatening and assaulting a minor boy on November 4, 2025, allegedly instructing him not to disclose the incident and physically abusing him. The court found the offense to be bailable, noted the accused had no prior criminal history, and determined he voluntarily surrendered. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on condition of regular court appearance and compliance with trial procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case