Anandi Lal vs State — 178/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 352,351(3). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSR010004812026
Filing Number
455/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
178/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
303
Police Station
Ikauna
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anandi Lal
Adv. Ram Gopal Shukla
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Anandi Lal v. State (178/2026) The court granted bail to Anandi Lal, accused of criminal intimidation and criminal intimidation causing fear of death under IPC Sections 351(3) and 352. The accused was charged with threatening and assaulting a minor boy on November 4, 2025, allegedly instructing him not to disclose the incident and physically abusing him. The court found the offense to be bailable, noted the accused had no prior criminal history, and determined he voluntarily surrendered. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on condition of regular court appearance and compliance with trial procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Anandi Lal v. State (178/2026) The court granted bail to Anandi Lal, accused of criminal intimidation and criminal intimidation causing fear of death under IPC Sections 351(3) and 352. The accused was charged with threatening and assaulting a minor boy on November 4, 2025, allegedly instructing him not to disclose the incident and physically abusing him. The court found the offense to be bailable, noted the accused had no prior criminal history, and determined he voluntarily surrendered. Bail was granted on a personal bond of ₹20,000 with two sureties of equal amount, on condition of regular court appearance and compliance with trial procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts