Parasnath Soni vs State — 181/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),317(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSR010004792026

Filing Number

453/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

181/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

HARDATTNAGAR GIRANT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),317(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Parasnath Soni

    Adv. Anil Kumar Yadav 2

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Parasnath Soni v. State (181/2026) The Sessions Court at Shravasti granted bail to accused Parasnath Soni, charged under IPC Sections 309(4) and 317(2) for alleged robbery of a handbag containing cash and mobile phone. The court found that Soni was not named in the FIR, was arrested on suspicion during Holi festival without evidence of looted items in his possession, and his prior acquittal demonstrates lack of criminal history, making the case based on circumstantial evidence. Bail granted with conditions: regular court attendance, no tampering with witnesses, and furnishing a bond of ₹50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 181/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Parasnath Soni v. State (181/2026) The Sessions Court at Shravasti granted bail to accused Parasnath Soni, charged under IPC Sections 309(4) and 317(2) for alleged robbery of a handbag containing cash and mobile phone. The court found that Soni was not named in the FIR, was arrested on suspicion during Holi festival without evidence of looted items in his possession, and his prior acquittal demonstrates lack of criminal history, making the case based on circumstantial evidence. Bail granted with conditions: regular court attendance, no tampering with witnesses, and furnishing a bond of ₹50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case