Parasnath Soni vs State — 181/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 309(4),317(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSR010004792026
Filing Number
453/2026
Filing Date
12-03-2026
Registration No
181/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
HARDATTNAGAR GIRANT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Parasnath Soni
Adv. Anil Kumar Yadav 2
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 20-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 19-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 12-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Parasnath Soni v. State (181/2026) The Sessions Court at Shravasti granted bail to accused Parasnath Soni, charged under IPC Sections 309(4) and 317(2) for alleged robbery of a handbag containing cash and mobile phone. The court found that Soni was not named in the FIR, was arrested on suspicion during Holi festival without evidence of looted items in his possession, and his prior acquittal demonstrates lack of criminal history, making the case based on circumstantial evidence. Bail granted with conditions: regular court attendance, no tampering with witnesses, and furnishing a bond of ₹50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Parasnath Soni v. State (181/2026) The Sessions Court at Shravasti granted bail to accused Parasnath Soni, charged under IPC Sections 309(4) and 317(2) for alleged robbery of a handbag containing cash and mobile phone. The court found that Soni was not named in the FIR, was arrested on suspicion during Holi festival without evidence of looted items in his possession, and his prior acquittal demonstrates lack of criminal history, making the case based on circumstantial evidence. Bail granted with conditions: regular court attendance, no tampering with witnesses, and furnishing a bond of ₹50,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts