Nisa Devi vs Santosh — 18/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440,. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 17th March 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: UPSR010004702026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
444/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
18/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
1-District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
17th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nisa Devi
Adv. Naseem Khan
Respondent(s)
Santosh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary In Criminal Revision No. 18/2026, the Sessions Court of Sravasti dismissed the revision petition filed by Nisha Devi challenging the lower court's order dated 21.10.2024. The lower court had registered Nisha Devi's complaint under Section 173(4) BNSS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) as a criminal case (rather than issuing an FIR) against Santosh for alleged attempted rape on 26.07.2024. The Sessions Court upheld the lower court's decision, finding it lawful and within jurisdiction, holding that the complainant possesses sufficient knowledge of facts to prove them as evidence, and that the magistrate properly exercised discretion in registering the complaint as a case without requiring immediate FIR registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary In Criminal Revision No. 18/2026, the Sessions Court of Sravasti dismissed the revision petition filed by Nisha Devi challenging the lower court's order dated 21.10.2024. The lower court had registered Nisha Devi's complaint under Section 173(4) BNSS (Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita) as a criminal case (rather than issuing an FIR) against Santosh for alleged attempted rape on 26.07.2024. The Sessions Court upheld the lower court's decision, finding it lawful and within jurisdiction, holding that the complainant possesses sufficient knowledge of facts to prove them as evidence, and that the magistrate properly exercised discretion in registering the complaint as a case without requiring immediate FIR registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts