Ritika Urf Deepika vs Raghuveer Urf Rahul — 16/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440. Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 16th March 2026.

Criminal Revision

CNR: UPSR010004622026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

436/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

16/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 438,440

Petitioner(s)

Ritika Urf Deepika

Adv. Guljari Lal

Respondent(s)

Raghuveer Urf Rahul

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District and Sessions Judge

16-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Copy of Judgement

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court of Shravasti dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Ritika (petitioner) challenging the Magistrate's order dated 18.08.2025. The court upheld the Magistrate's decision to register a complaint under Section 173(4) BNSS based on the petitioner's application alleging dowry harassment and domestic violence by her husband and in-laws following her marriage on 29.04.2025. The court found sufficient grounds existed to register the case without requiring a formal FIR, as the facts were within the petitioner's knowledge and she could present evidence during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Sessions Court of Shravasti dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by Ritika (petitioner) challenging the Magistrate's order dated 18.08.2025. The court upheld the Magistrate's decision to register a complaint under Section 173(4) BNSS based on the petitioner's application alleging dowry harassment and domestic violence by her husband and in-laws following her marriage on 29.04.2025. The court found sufficient grounds existed to register the case without requiring a formal FIR, as the facts were within the petitioner's knowledge and she could present evidence during trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case