Somesh mishra vs State — 155/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 115(2),351(3),352,191(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSR010004222026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
397/2026
Filing Date
27-02-2026
Registration No
155/2026
Registration Date
27-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Special Judge(SC/ST)
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
26
Police Station
Gilaula
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Somesh mishra
Adv. Brijesh Kumar Mishra
Amit Tiwari
Subhash Mishra
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Special Judge(SC/ST)
Disposed
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST) Shravasti granted bail to three accused persons—Somesh Mishra, Amit Tiwari, and Subhash Mishra—in a case involving charges under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 191(2), and SC/ST Act provisions. The court found that the accused had no prior criminal history, the maximum punishment for the charges was 7 years imprisonment, and they had previously complied with interim bail conditions, making them suitable for bail release. Each accused was ordered to furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of equal amount, with conditions not to intimidate witnesses or obstruct trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Special Judge (SC/ST) Shravasti granted bail to three accused persons—Somesh Mishra, Amit Tiwari, and Subhash Mishra—in a case involving charges under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 191(2), and SC/ST Act provisions. The court found that the accused had no prior criminal history, the maximum punishment for the charges was 7 years imprisonment, and they had previously complied with interim bail conditions, making them suitable for bail release. Each accused was ordered to furnish a personal bond of ₹50,000 and two sureties of equal amount, with conditions not to intimidate witnesses or obstruct trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts