Jiyauddin vs State — 5/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),3(5),70(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: UPSR010004152026

Filing Number

390/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

5/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

601

Police Station

Bhinga

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),3(5),70(2)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 5G,6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jiyauddin

    Adv. Satish Kumar Maurya

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgementView PDF

    The court allowed the criminal appeal and granted bail to the juvenile accused Jiyauddin under the Juvenile Justice Act, finding that the lower court's bail rejection order was not legally justified and lacked proper consideration of the statutory requirements under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act. The court released the juvenile on bail with personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh and a surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including parental custody and compliance with court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the criminal appeal and granted bail to the juvenile accused Jiyauddin under the Juvenile Justice Act, finding that the lower court's bail rejection order was not legally justified and lacked proper consideration of the statutory requirements under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act. The court released the juvenile on bail with personal bond of Rs. 1 lakh and a surety of equal amount, subject to conditions including parental custody and compliance with court orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case