Kunnu Lal vs State — 147/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 238, 239, 241, 61. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSR010004092026
Filing Number
384/2026
Filing Date
25-Feb-2026
Registration No
147/2026
Registration Date
25-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Additional District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
9
Police Station
Sirsiya
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Kunnu Lal
Adv. Suresh Chandra Tiwari
Respondent(s)
-
1.State
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Shravasti, granted anticipatory bail to Kunnu Lal (44 years) in a murder case (FIR No. 09/2026 under BNS Sections 238, 239, 241, 61) involving the death of a young woman. The court found that while investigation is ongoing, the accused's house is far from the victim's residence, he has no criminal history, a co-accused already received bail, and there was no specific role attributed to him—warranting bail on conditions including cooperation with police interrogation, non-tampering with witnesses, ₹50,000 bond, and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
12-Mar-2026
Hearing
Additional District and Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
District and Sessions Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 147/2026
Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Shravasti, granted anticipatory bail to Kunnu Lal (44 years) in a murder case (FIR No. 09/2026 under BNS Sections 238, 239, 241, 61) involving the death of a young woman. The court found that while investigation is ongoing, the accused's house is far from the victim's residence, he has no criminal history, a co-accused already received bail, and there was no specific role attributed to him—warranting bail on conditions including cooperation with police interrogation, non-tampering with witnesses, ₹50,000 bond, and regular court appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts