radhyeshyam vishwakarma urf chunn vs State — 143/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,126(2),351(2). Disposed: Contested--REJECT on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSR010004062026

Filing Number

381/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

143/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECT

Last updated 06-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

Bhinga

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 74,126(2),351(2)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 9m,10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.radhyeshyam vishwakarma urf chunn

    Adv. Alok Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary The court rejected the bail application of Radheyshyam Vishwakarma (alias Chunn) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 74, 126(2), 351(2) and POCSO Act sections 9(m)/10 for allegedly molesting an 11-year-old girl. The court found credible evidence from the victim's consistent statements and corroborating eyewitnesses that the accused forcibly grabbed the child while returning from school, dragged her into a field, and sexually harassed her, constituting a serious crime against society that warrants custody rather than bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 143/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court rejected the bail application of Radheyshyam Vishwakarma (alias Chunn) in a case involving charges under IPC sections 74, 126(2), 351(2) and POCSO Act sections 9(m)/10 for allegedly molesting an 11-year-old girl. The court found credible evidence from the victim's consistent statements and corroborating eyewitnesses that the accused forcibly grabbed the child while returning from school, dragged her into a field, and sexually harassed her, constituting a serious crime against society that warrants custody rather than bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case