suresh vs State — 142/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),65(1),127(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Application

CNR: UPSR010004032026

Filing Number

378/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

142/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

Ikauna

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),65(1),127(2)
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.suresh

    Adv. Chandra Kumar Misra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The Additional Session Judge rejected the bail application (No. 142/2026) filed by Suresh against the State dated 12-03-2026. The court found the bail plea devoid of merit after hearing arguments from both the accused's counsel and the ADGC representing the State, and accordingly dismissed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

  6. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Session Judge rejected the bail application (No. 142/2026) filed by Suresh against the State dated 12-03-2026. The court found the bail plea devoid of merit after hearing arguments from both the accused's counsel and the ADGC representing the State, and accordingly dismissed the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case