indrapal urf indrajeet vs State — 141/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),87. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 11th March 2026.

Bail Application

CNR: UPSR010003862026

Case disposed

Filing Number

361/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

141/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

FIR Details

FIR Number

18

Police Station

Sonva

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),87
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act 2012 Section 11,12

Petitioner(s)

indrapal urf indrajeet

Adv. Om Prakash Azad

Respondent(s)

State

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

11-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

Hearing

06-03-2026

Hearing

26-02-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
Copy of Order

Case Summary Bail Application 141/2026 - Indrapal @ Indrajeet vs. State The court granted bail to the accused Indrapal @ Indrajeet, who was arrested under sections 137(2), 87 BNS and 11/12 POSCO Act for allegedly abducting a minor girl (age 17 years 6 months). The court found that the victim herself stated she willingly called the accused and went with him, that the accused has no prior criminal history, and that there were inconsistencies in the FIR and investigation. The court imposed a personal bond of ₹50,000 with an undertaking to cooperate during trial and appear before court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Bail Application 141/2026 - Indrapal @ Indrajeet vs. State The court granted bail to the accused Indrapal @ Indrajeet, who was arrested under sections 137(2), 87 BNS and 11/12 POSCO Act for allegedly abducting a minor girl (age 17 years 6 months). The court found that the victim herself stated she willingly called the accused and went with him, that the accused has no prior criminal history, and that there were inconsistencies in the FIR and investigation. The court imposed a personal bond of ₹50,000 with an undertaking to cooperate during trial and appear before court as required. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case