mahfooj vs State — 140/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 137(2),74,127(2). Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 10th March 2026.
Bail Application
CNR: UPSR010003852026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
360/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
140/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
57
Police Station
Bhinga
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
mahfooj
Adv. Pravin Kumar Tripathi
Respondent(s)
State
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted bail to the accused Mahfooj in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 74, 127(2) and POCSO Act Sections 7/8. The court found significant contradictions in the victim's statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC, noting that her statement under Section 183 did not corroborate the allegations made in Section 180, and observed there was no credible evidence that the accused had taken the victim away or committed the alleged offense. The accused was released on bail with a personal bond of ₹50,000 and an undertaking to appear during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted bail to the accused Mahfooj in a case involving charges under IPC Sections 137(2), 74, 127(2) and POCSO Act Sections 7/8. The court found significant contradictions in the victim's statements under Sections 180 and 183 of the CrPC, noting that her statement under Section 183 did not corroborate the allegations made in Section 180, and observed there was no credible evidence that the accused had taken the victim away or committed the alleged offense. The accused was released on bail with a personal bond of ₹50,000 and an undertaking to appear during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts