State vs Halim Khan @ Chotkau — 94/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498A,304B IPC. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.

Sessions Case

CNR: UPSR010003562023

Evidence

Next Hearing

27th April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

313/2023

Filing Date

21-02-2023

Registration No

94/2023

Registration Date

21-02-2023

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

FIR Details

FIR Number

544

Police Station

Malhipur

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 498A,304B IPC
Dowry Prohibition (D.P) Act Section 3/4

Petitioner(s)

State

Respondent(s)

Halim Khan @ Chotkau

Dalif Kah

Saliman

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)

22-04-2026

Evidence

28-03-2026

Evidence

27-03-2026

Evidence

10-03-2026

Evidence

20-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

03-06-2025
Copy of Order

Summary The court dismissed a petition (Section 319 CrPC) filed by the complainant seeking to summon two additional accused persons (Gujiya/Gudiya and Saajrun) in a dowry death case (Crime No. 544/2022). The judge found that the complainant and his wife provided false and contradictory testimonies, and that the petition was motivated by extortion rather than genuine criminal prosecution. The court ruled that insufficient credible evidence existed to implicate the proposed accused in the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court dismissed a petition (Section 319 CrPC) filed by the complainant seeking to summon two additional accused persons (Gujiya/Gudiya and Saajrun) in a dowry death case (Crime No. 544/2022). The judge found that the complainant and his wife provided false and contradictory testimonies, and that the petition was motivated by extortion rather than genuine criminal prosecution. The court ruled that insufficient credible evidence existed to implicate the proposed accused in the crime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District and Session Judge All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case