Malikram urf bachcha ram vs Ajit pratap singh — 18/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 173(4). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 13th March 2026.
Criminal Misc. Cases
CNR: UPSR010003512026
Filing Number
330/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
18/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Special Judge(SC/ST)
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 23-Apr-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
Sirsiya
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Malikram urf bachcha ram
Adv. Naseem Khan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ajit pratap singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of OrderView PDF
Case Summary The court accepted a petition under Section 173(4) of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Malik Ram Urf Bachcharam against Ajit Pratap Singh. The petitioner, a Scheduled Caste (Pasi) individual from Shravasti district, alleged that on January 24, 2026, the respondent stopped him while he was going to pursue his pending Public Distribution System (PDS) license case and assaulted him with a stick while using caste-based abusive language and threatening him with false cases. The court found the allegations credible and ordered the police station to register a cognizable offense and investigate the matter under relevant sections of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, as the investigation could reveal new facts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Special Judge(SC/ST)
-
10-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge(SC/ST)
-
07-Mar-2026
Hearing
Special Judge(SC/ST)
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 18/2026
Case Summary The court accepted a petition under Section 173(4) of the Indian Code of Criminal Procedure filed by Malik Ram Urf Bachcharam against Ajit Pratap Singh. The petitioner, a Scheduled Caste (Pasi) individual from Shravasti district, alleged that on January 24, 2026, the respondent stopped him while he was going to pursue his pending Public Distribution System (PDS) license case and assaulted him with a stick while using caste-based abusive language and threatening him with false cases. The court found the allegations credible and ordered the police station to register a cognizable offense and investigate the matter under relevant sections of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, as the investigation could reveal new facts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts