Amardeep urf Bablu and others vs Pankaj Dev Gupta and other — 2/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24,151. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Civil Cases

CNR: UPSR010001562026

Filing Number

4/2026

Filing Date

17-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 24,151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amardeep urf Bablu and others

    Adv. Vinod Kumar Srivastva

  2. 2.Sandeep urf Pandey

  3. 3.Sudeep Urf Chhotu

  4. 4.Raghuveer Urf Lala

  5. 5.Sudheer Urf Udhir

  6. 6.Shanti Devi Urf Savitri Devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pankaj Dev Gupta and other

  2. 2.Vinod Kumar Gupta

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    The court approved a petition under Section 24 and 151 CrPC to consolidate two related civil suits (OS No. 273/2023 and OS No. 78/2024) concerning a property dispute at Mohalla Nai Bazar, Bijnor. Both suits involve identical subject matter and parties, and the court found it justified to have them heard together by a single bench for administrative efficiency and justice. Accordingly, the second suit was transferred from the subordinate court to the principal civil court for consolidation and joint hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District and Sessions Judge

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    District and Sessions Judge

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 17-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court approved a petition under Section 24 and 151 CrPC to consolidate two related civil suits (OS No. 273/2023 and OS No. 78/2024) concerning a property dispute at Mohalla Nai Bazar, Bijnor. Both suits involve identical subject matter and parties, and the court found it justified to have them heard together by a single bench for administrative efficiency and justice. Accordingly, the second suit was transferred from the subordinate court to the principal civil court for consolidation and joint hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case