State vs Pappu @ Uttam Kumar Advocate - Pawan Kumar Srivastava — 100023/2005
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 13th March 2026.
Special Gangester Act
CNR: UPSR010000042005
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100023/2005
Filing Date
08-12-2005
Registration No
100023/2005
Registration Date
08-12-2005
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
348
Police Station
Malhipur
Year
2005
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State
Adv. A.D.G.C. Criminal
Respondent(s)
Pappu @ Uttam Kumar Advocate - Pawan Kumar Srivastava
Raja Ram
Adv. Omkar Ntah Verma
Islam @ Matiha
Adv. Omkar Ntah Verma
Shyam lal
Adv. Pawan Kumar Srivastava
Hearing History
Judge: 6-Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge(Exclusive POCSO Act)
Disposed
Statement U/S 313
Statement U/S 313
Statement U/S 313
Statement U/S 313
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Statement U/S 313 | |
| 09-03-2026 | Statement U/S 313 | |
| 27-02-2026 | Statement U/S 313 | |
| 24-02-2026 | Statement U/S 313 |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Special Gangster Act court acquitted three accused (Rajaram, Islam, and Shyamlal) of charges under IPC Section 307 and the Gangster Act, finding prosecution evidence insufficient and contradictory. One accused (Pappu) had his case separated, and another (Shyamlal) died during proceedings; the court found the investigation shoddy and prosecution narrative unconvincing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Special Gangster Act court acquitted three accused (Rajaram, Islam, and Shyamlal) of charges under IPC Section 307 and the Gangster Act, finding prosecution evidence insufficient and contradictory. One accused (Pappu) had his case separated, and another (Shyamlal) died during proceedings; the court found the investigation shoddy and prosecution narrative unconvincing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts