state of up vs ajay pratap — 1919/2024

Case under Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act Section 24/33. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 07th March 2026.

Case disposed

Warrant or Summons Criminal Case

CNR: UPSP100032332024

Filing Number

3229/2024

Filing Date

21-May-2024

Registration No

1919/2024

Registration Date

21-May-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoband

Judge

1-A.c.j.m, Deoband

Decision Date

07-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Act Section 24/33

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.state of up

    Adv. apo

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ajay pratap

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    A.c.j.m, Deoband

  3. 05-Jan-2026

    Lok Adalat

    A.c.j.m, Deoband

  4. 20-Oct-2025

    Lok Adalat

    A.c.j.m, Deoband

  5. 21-Jul-2025

    Lok Adalat

    A.c.j.m, Deoband

  6. 29-Apr-2025

    Lok Adalat

    A.c.j.m, Deoband

  7. 05-Feb-2025

    Lok Adalat

    A.c.j.m, Deoband

  8. 07-Dec-2024

    Lok Adalat

    A.c.j.m, Deoband

  9. 14-Sep-2024

    JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: On 14-09-2024, the Additional Civil Judge/Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deband, Saharanpur, heard case 1919/2024 (State of UP v. Ajay Pratap) in the National Lok Adalat. The court issued a handwritten order and adjourned the matter due to the stenographer being engaged in other work. No substantive decision on merits was delivered; the case was merely posted for adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 14-Sep-2024

    Lok Adalat

    A.c.j.m, Deoband

  11. 13-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 21-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1919/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: On 14-09-2024, the Additional Civil Judge/Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deband, Saharanpur, heard case 1919/2024 (State of UP v. Ajay Pratap) in the National Lok Adalat. The court issued a handwritten order and adjourned the matter due to the stenographer being engaged in other work. No substantive decision on merits was delivered; the case was merely posted for adjournment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case