State Government vs SAURABH — 133/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,34,323,504. Status: Appearance of accused. Next hearing: 23rd May 2026 Date Not Updated.
Sessions Case
CNR: UPSP070002742022
Next Hearing
23rd May 2026 Date Not Updated
Filing Number
209/2022
Filing Date
09-09-2022
Registration No
133/2022
Registration Date
09-09-2022
Court
District and Session Judge, Deoband
Judge
1-Addl. District Judge, Deoband
FIR Details
FIR Number
49
Police Station
NANOTA
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government
Adv. ADGC
Respondent(s)
SAURABH
PARIKSHIT URF SHUBHAM
DHRUVA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Addl. District Judge, Deoband
Appearance of accused
For examination of witnesses
For examination of witnesses
For examination of witnesses
For examination of witnesses
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-05-2026 | Appearance of accused |
| 27-04-2026 | For examination of witnesses |
| 30-03-2026 | For examination of witnesses |
| 12-03-2026 | For examination of witnesses |
| 20-02-2026 | For examination of witnesses |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 133/2022 - State v. Saurabh and Others Outcome: The court dismissed the state's petition under Section 319 CrPC to add Charan Singh (the fourth accused) as a co-accused in this criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 307, 34, 323, and 504. Key Finding: The court found insufficient evidence against Charan Singh. CCTV camera footage from his residence showed him present at a location 50 km from the incident site at the time of the alleged attack (2:00 PM), making his presence at the crime scene impossible. Accordingly, Charan Singh's name was excluded from the chargesheet, and the petition was rejected in light of applicable legal precedents requiring substantial evidence before adding accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 133/2022 - State v. Saurabh and Others Outcome: The court dismissed the state's petition under Section 319 CrPC to add Charan Singh (the fourth accused) as a co-accused in this criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 307, 34, 323, and 504. Key Finding: The court found insufficient evidence against Charan Singh. CCTV camera footage from his residence showed him present at a location 50 km from the incident site at the time of the alleged attack (2:00 PM), making his presence at the crime scene impossible. Accordingly, Charan Singh's name was excluded from the chargesheet, and the petition was rejected in light of applicable legal precedents requiring substantial evidence before adding accused persons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts