ASHWANI SHARMA vs State of U.P. — 1379/2025

Case under Limitation Act Section 5. Disposed: Contested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

Criminal Revision

CNR: UPSP010170282025

Filing Number

15707/2025

Filing Date

24-Dec-2025

Registration No

1379/2025

Registration Date

24-Dec-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

1-District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Limitation Act Section 5

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHWANI SHARMA

    Adv. MR SHARWAN KUMAR SHARMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of U.P.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 1379/2025 (Ashwani Sharma v. State of U.P.) The court granted Ashwani Sharma's application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 21-day delay in filing a criminal petition. The delay occurred because settlement negotiations between the petitioner and Respondent No. 2 (Atul Sharma) were ongoing after an earlier court order dated 05.09.2025, and Respondent No. 2 subsequently refused to settle despite the agreed terms. Applying a liberal approach balancing substantive justice over technical strictness, the court accepted the petitioner's application, imposed a token fine of ₹500, and scheduled the case for hearing on 02.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    hearing

    District Judge

  7. 24-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 24-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1379/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1379/2025 (Ashwani Sharma v. State of U.P.) The court granted Ashwani Sharma's application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act to condone a 21-day delay in filing a criminal petition. The delay occurred because settlement negotiations between the petitioner and Respondent No. 2 (Atul Sharma) were ongoing after an earlier court order dated 05.09.2025, and Respondent No. 2 subsequently refused to settle despite the agreed terms. Applying a liberal approach balancing substantive justice over technical strictness, the court accepted the petitioner's application, imposed a token fine of ₹500, and scheduled the case for hearing on 02.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case