GULSHAN KUMAR vs State of U.P. — 546/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 440. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 07th April 2026.
Criminal Revision
CNR: UPSP010146482025
Filing Number
13546/2025
Filing Date
12-Nov-2025
Registration No
546/2025
Registration Date
12-Nov-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
4-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GULSHAN KUMAR
Adv. NOT APPLICABLE
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of U.P.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The court allowed Gulshan Kumar's criminal revision against a magistrate's dismissal of his protest petition challenging a police final report. The magistrate had dismissed the petition merely on the ground of Kumar's absence without examining the merits, allegations in the FIR, witness statements, or evidence collected—constituting non-application of judicial mind. The court held that protest petitions cannot be dismissed in default and magistrates must apply judicial scrutiny to final reports by considering the case diary and evidence. The court set aside the dismissal order and directed the magistrate to reconsider the final report and protest petition on merits with reasoned findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
27-Mar-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
12-Mar-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
18-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
05-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
09-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.4
-
12-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 546/2025
Summary: The court allowed Gulshan Kumar's criminal revision against a magistrate's dismissal of his protest petition challenging a police final report. The magistrate had dismissed the petition merely on the ground of Kumar's absence without examining the merits, allegations in the FIR, witness statements, or evidence collected—constituting non-application of judicial mind. The court held that protest petitions cannot be dismissed in default and magistrates must apply judicial scrutiny to final reports by considering the case diary and evidence. The court set aside the dismissal order and directed the magistrate to reconsider the final report and protest petition on merits with reasoned findings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts