ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH vs AMEER CHAND TANEJA S/O BABURAM — 87/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 104. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Appeal
CNR: UPSP010053852025
Filing Number
391/2025
Filing Date
10-Apr-2025
Registration No
87/2025
Registration Date
10-Apr-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH
Adv. MR SATISH KUMAR JAGGA
Respondent(s)
-
1.AMEER CHAND TANEJA S/O BABURAM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 87/2025 (Alok Mittal v. Ameer Chand Taneja) Court Decision: The Additional District Judge partially allowed the rent control appeal, setting aside the lower court's order for tenant eviction and excessive rent increase. The court determined that the fair market rent for the disputed shops is ₹6,500/month (with applicable GST and municipal taxes), rejecting the landlord's demand for ₹75,000/month. The tenant must register a tenancy agreement within three months, and the landlord is entitled to pursue legal remedies for rent recovery according to law. Key Reasoning: The court found that the landlord failed to properly invoke Section 4(3) of the UP Urban Property (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Act 2021 regarding non-registration of tenancy, and that rent enhancement under Section 9 must follow prescribed procedures with market-based valuation, not arbitrary increases exceeding statutory limits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
26-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
24-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
19-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
18-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
21-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
20-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
08-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
02-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
01-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
03-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
25-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
04-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
23-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
29-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
22-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-May-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Apr-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 87/2025
Case Summary: 87/2025 (Alok Mittal v. Ameer Chand Taneja) Court Decision: The Additional District Judge partially allowed the rent control appeal, setting aside the lower court's order for tenant eviction and excessive rent increase. The court determined that the fair market rent for the disputed shops is ₹6,500/month (with applicable GST and municipal taxes), rejecting the landlord's demand for ₹75,000/month. The tenant must register a tenancy agreement within three months, and the landlord is entitled to pursue legal remedies for rent recovery according to law. Key Reasoning: The court found that the landlord failed to properly invoke Section 4(3) of the UP Urban Property (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Act 2021 regarding non-registration of tenancy, and that rent enhancement under Section 9 must follow prescribed procedures with market-based valuation, not arbitrary increases exceeding statutory limits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts