ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH vs NEERAJ BANSAL S/O SURENDRA BANSAL — 89/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 104. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Misc. Civil Appeal

CNR: UPSP010053832025

Filing Number

389/2025

Filing Date

10-Apr-2025

Registration No

89/2025

Registration Date

10-Apr-2025

Court

District and Session Judge

Judge

5-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECIDED

Last updated 28-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH

    Adv. MR SATISH KUMAR JAGGA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NEERAJ BANSAL S/O SURENDRA BANSAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Alok Mittal v. Neeraj Bansal (89/2025) The court partially allowed the petitioner's rent control appeal. The lower court had ordered the tenant to pay 7% annual rent increase under the 2021 UP Urban Tenancy Act. However, the appellate court found the tenant had validly rejected the landlord's notice to register a tenancy agreement and was not obligated to accept the enhanced rent. The court set the ground floor shops at ₹6,500/month and first floor shop at ₹5,500/month (with GST and municipal taxes), directing the tenant to register the lease within three months at the respondent's expense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  6. 24-Feb-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  8. 18-Feb-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  9. 17-Feb-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  10. 16-Feb-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  11. 13-Feb-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  12. 05-Feb-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  13. 28-Jan-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  14. 21-Jan-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  15. 20-Jan-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  16. 13-Jan-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  17. 08-Jan-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  18. 05-Jan-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  19. 02-Jan-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  20. 01-Jan-2026

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  21. 16-Dec-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  22. 12-Dec-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  23. 10-Dec-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  24. 03-Dec-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  25. 27-Nov-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  26. 25-Nov-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  27. 15-Nov-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  28. 04-Nov-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  29. 17-Oct-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  30. 09-Oct-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  31. 23-Sep-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  32. 15-Sep-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  33. 09-Sep-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  34. 29-Aug-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  35. 22-Aug-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  36. 12-Aug-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  37. 28-Jul-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  38. 09-Jul-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  39. 16-May-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  40. 28-Apr-2025

    hearing

    Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1

  41. 10-Apr-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 10-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Alok Mittal v. Neeraj Bansal (89/2025) The court partially allowed the petitioner's rent control appeal. The lower court had ordered the tenant to pay 7% annual rent increase under the 2021 UP Urban Tenancy Act. However, the appellate court found the tenant had validly rejected the landlord's notice to register a tenancy agreement and was not obligated to accept the enhanced rent. The court set the ground floor shops at ₹6,500/month and first floor shop at ₹5,500/month (with GST and municipal taxes), directing the tenant to register the lease within three months at the respondent's expense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case