ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH vs REETU CHUG W/O RAJESH CHUG — 90/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 104. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Appeal
CNR: UPSP010053822025
Filing Number
388/2025
Filing Date
10-Apr-2025
Registration No
90/2025
Registration Date
10-Apr-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH
Adv. MR SATISH KUMAR JAGGA
Respondent(s)
-
1.REETU CHUG W/O RAJESH CHUG
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Rent Control Appeal 90/2025 Alok Mittal v. Reetu Chug The court partially allowed the petitioner's (landlord's) appeal against an eviction order. The lower court had directed the tenant to vacate the property and pay increased rent at 7% annually under the 2021 UP Rental Act. The appellate court found the lower court erred in several respects: (1) the tenant failed to register a formal rental agreement as required by the 2021 Act within the statutory period, making her liable for default eviction; (2) the 7% annual increase violated the Act's provisions requiring compound interest-based increases; and (3) the market-determined rent should be ₹6,500/month, not the demanded higher amount. The court partially upheld the eviction but directed both parties to execute a proper rental deed within three months at the determined fair market rent with GST and municipal taxes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
26-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
24-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
19-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
18-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
21-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
20-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
08-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
02-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
01-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
03-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
25-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
04-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
23-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
29-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
22-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-May-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Apr-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 90/2025
Case Summary: Rent Control Appeal 90/2025 Alok Mittal v. Reetu Chug The court partially allowed the petitioner's (landlord's) appeal against an eviction order. The lower court had directed the tenant to vacate the property and pay increased rent at 7% annually under the 2021 UP Rental Act. The appellate court found the lower court erred in several respects: (1) the tenant failed to register a formal rental agreement as required by the 2021 Act within the statutory period, making her liable for default eviction; (2) the 7% annual increase violated the Act's provisions requiring compound interest-based increases; and (3) the market-determined rent should be ₹6,500/month, not the demanded higher amount. The court partially upheld the eviction but directed both parties to execute a proper rental deed within three months at the determined fair market rent with GST and municipal taxes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts