ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH vs DEEPAK PAHWA S/O PREM PAHWA — 93/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 104. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Appeal
CNR: UPSP010053792025
Filing Number
385/2025
Filing Date
10-Apr-2025
Registration No
93/2025
Registration Date
10-Apr-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH
Adv. MR SATISH KUMAR JAGGA
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEEPAK PAHWA S/O PREM PAHWA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Alok Mittal v. Deepak Pahwa (Rent Control Appeal 93/2025) The court partially allowed the tenant's appeal against an eviction order. The tenant challenged the rent officer's direction to pay 7% annual increase from the effective date of the 2021 Uttar Pradesh Urban Property Act. The court held that the tenant's earlier petition for eviction was properly rejected, as the tenant had not registered a tenancy deed within the prescribed period and lost his right to do so under Section 4(3). However, the court revised the rent to ₹6,500/month (based on market value and surrounding property rates) instead of the excessive ₹25,000/month previously ordered, and directed both parties to register a tenancy agreement at the prescribed rent with future increases as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
26-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
24-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
19-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
18-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
21-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
20-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
08-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
02-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
01-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
03-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
25-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
04-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
23-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
29-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
22-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-May-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Apr-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 93/2025
Case Summary: Alok Mittal v. Deepak Pahwa (Rent Control Appeal 93/2025) The court partially allowed the tenant's appeal against an eviction order. The tenant challenged the rent officer's direction to pay 7% annual increase from the effective date of the 2021 Uttar Pradesh Urban Property Act. The court held that the tenant's earlier petition for eviction was properly rejected, as the tenant had not registered a tenancy deed within the prescribed period and lost his right to do so under Section 4(3). However, the court revised the rent to ₹6,500/month (based on market value and surrounding property rates) instead of the excessive ₹25,000/month previously ordered, and directed both parties to register a tenancy agreement at the prescribed rent with future increases as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts