ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH vs NIRMALA BATLA W/O SUBASH BATLA — 94/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 104. Disposed: Contested--DECIDED on 12th March 2026.
Misc. Civil Appeal
CNR: UPSP010053782025
Filing Number
384/2025
Filing Date
10-Apr-2025
Registration No
94/2025
Registration Date
10-Apr-2025
Court
District and Session Judge
Judge
5-Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECIDED
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALOK MITTAL S/O JAI PRAKASH
Adv. MR SATISH KUMAR JAGGA
Respondent(s)
-
1.NIRMALA BATLA W/O SUBASH BATLA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Rent Control Appeal 94/2025 Court Decision: The Additional District Judge partially allowed the rent control appeal filed by Alok Mittal (petitioner/property owner) against the Rent Authority's order dated 29.03.2025. The lower court's direction to increase rent by 7% annually under Section 9 was reversed. Instead, the court determined that the property (a ground-floor shop in G.P. Shopping Complex, Saharanpur) should be leased at ₹6,500/month based on prevailing market rates in the surrounding area, with GST and municipal taxes payable by the tenant. The eviction petition against tenant Nirmala Batla was dismissed, but she was directed to execute a registered tenancy agreement within three months and pay the revised rent. The tenant remains liable for regular rent increases as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
26-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
24-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
19-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
18-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Feb-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
21-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
20-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
13-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
08-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
05-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
02-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
01-Jan-2026
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
03-Dec-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
27-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
25-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
04-Nov-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
17-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Oct-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
23-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
15-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Sep-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
29-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
22-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
12-Aug-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
09-Jul-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
16-May-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
28-Apr-2025
hearing
Additional District Judge, C.R. No.1
-
10-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 94/2025
Case Summary: Rent Control Appeal 94/2025 Court Decision: The Additional District Judge partially allowed the rent control appeal filed by Alok Mittal (petitioner/property owner) against the Rent Authority's order dated 29.03.2025. The lower court's direction to increase rent by 7% annually under Section 9 was reversed. Instead, the court determined that the property (a ground-floor shop in G.P. Shopping Complex, Saharanpur) should be leased at ₹6,500/month based on prevailing market rates in the surrounding area, with GST and municipal taxes payable by the tenant. The eviction petition against tenant Nirmala Batla was dismissed, but she was directed to execute a registered tenancy agreement within three months and pay the revised rent. The tenant remains liable for regular rent increases as per law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts